Saturday, May 31, 2014

How Behavioral Finance Can Help Bond Investors

The principles of behavioral finance have been applied extensively to the equity markets, and many financial advisors make good use of them now. But what about applying behavioral finance to better understand and navigate the fixed income market?

To date, the bond market hasn’t really been studied from a behavioral perspective, said Zach Jonson, director of fund management at ICON Advisers, because the majority of investors have tended to be larger, buy-and-hold type players who don’t really exhibit the same behavioral tendencies as equity investors. But since the 2008 financial crisis, market dynamics have done an about-face that’s resulted in an increasing number of nontraditional investors gravitating toward the bond market — and they, Jonson said, are exhibiting the same kinds of behavioral biases vis-à-vis bonds as toward equities.

“Between the full-blown fear after all that took place and the 24-hour news cycle, what we saw was basically the self-fulfilling prophecy of everyone running to the same spot,” Jonson said. “This drove massive amounts of liquidity into bonds.”

Since 2007, more than $1.3 billon has flowed into bonds, and this in turn spurred record levels of corporate bond issuance in the United States. Furthermore, Jonson said, the proliferation of bond ETFs, as well as the general focus on income creation for retirement have also supported the increased cash going into bonds.

However, because this rush of liquidity into bonds is so new, both financial advisors and their clients continue to view the fixed income market through a very narrow lens, Jonson said: namely the direction of interest rates. This focus in turn engenders certain behavioral tendencies that then impact the market and result in different kinds of inefficiencies.

As a result, Jonson believes that the bond market, like its equity counterpart, is a victim of such classic behavioral traits as loss aversion, belief perseverance and herd mentality.  

Loss aversion, a bias in which investors prefer to avoid losses to acquiring gains, can lead investors to place greater importance on the short-term and less on the long-term. According to Jonson, it has had a major impact on the bond market in the past years, affecting everything from U.S. Treasuries—which he said sold based on concerns about spikes in interest rates and increased volatility—to bond mutual funds, which sold based on short-term concerns as opposed to the long-term, diversification benefits they offer.

Ditto for herd behavior, where individuals come to a similar conclusion or act in a similar manner with the desire to achieve the same results. In so doing, though, they make the same mistakes, Jonson said, and just as it does in the equity market, their behavior creates inefficiencies and volatility in the bond market.

“Historically, the buy-and-hold nature of bond market investors shielded the market from the same kind of behavioral reactions that affected the equity markets,” Jonson said, “but now, the market has undergone a transition, and what’s required is a change of mentality in the way that advisors navigate the bond market and manage fixed income for their clients.”

That means advisors, investors and fund managers too, should be able to leverage behavioral patterns to their advantage in order to “become bond managers in equity clothes,” Jonson said.

He believes that bond allocations should be much more actively and tactically managed and that financial advisors should be looking much more carefully at fixed income managers to better understand their strategies and approach to the market. Advisors should choose to invest with those managers who are willing to “move around the market” and look at it from the bottom up rather than the top down.

“Our general belief is that money will continue to go into bonds because we think interest rates will remain low,” Jonson said. “So many bond investors are interest rate forecasters, but it’s individual security analysis that can actually beat the market, and taking advantage of behaviors will be the best way to find the points to get in and get out of the market.”

In this “new” bond market, the more tactical fund managers will fare better, Jonson said, and advisors who do the legwork to seek them out will be able to create better bond portfolios for their clients.

---

Check out Applying Behavioral Analytics to Fund Managers on ThinkAdvisor.

Friday, May 30, 2014

4 Stocks Under $10 Making Big Moves

DELAFIELD, Wis. (Stockpickr) -- At Stockpickr, we track daily portfolios of stocks that are the biggest percentage gainers and the biggest percentage losers.

>>5 Stocks Insiders Love Right Now

Stocks that are making large moves like these are favorites among short-term traders because they can jump into these names and try to capture some of that massive volatility. Stocks that are making big-percentage moves either up or down are usually in play because their sector is becoming attractive or they have a major fundamental catalyst such as a recent earnings release. Sometimes stocks making big moves have been hit with an analyst upgrade or an analyst downgrade.

Regardless of the reason behind it, when a stock makes a large-percentage move, it is often just the start of a new major trend -- a trend that can lead to huge profits. If you time your trade correctly, combining technical indicators with fundamental trends, discipline and sound money management, you will be well on your way to investment success.

>>5 Large-Cap Trades for All-Time Highs

With that in mind, let's take a closer look at a several stocks under $10 that are making large moves to the upside.

Vical

Vical (VICL) is engaged in the research and development of biopharmaceutical products based on its DNA delivery technologies for the prevention and treatment of serious or life-threatening diseases. This stock closed up 2.4% to $1.25 a share in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $1.22-$1.28

52-Week Range: $1.01-$4.51

Thursday's Volume: 1.27 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 1.04 million

From a technical perspective, VICL spiked modestly higher here back above its 50-day moving average of $1.24 with above-average volume. This spike higher on Thursday is starting to push shares of VICL within range of triggering a big breakout trade. That trade will hit if VICL manages to take out some near-term overhead resistance levels at $1.30 to $1.36 with strong upside volume. Keep in mind that taking out those levels will also push VICL back above its 200-day moving average of $1.29.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in VICL as long as it's trending above some near-term support levels at $1.20 or at $1.16 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 1.04 million shares. If that breakout starts soon, then VICL will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $1.50 to $1.60, or even $1.66 to $1.75.

Hercules Offshore

Hercules Offshore (HERO), together with its subsidiaries, provides shallow-water drilling and marine services to the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry worldwide. This stock closed up 2.2% to $4.55 a share in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $4.45-$4.56

52-Week Range: $4.21-$7.96

Thursday's Volume: 6.74 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 4.15 million

From a technical perspective, HERO bounced notably higher here right off its 50-day moving average of $4.49 with strong upside volume flows. This stock recently formed a double bottom chart pattern at $4.34 to $4.32. Following that bottom, shares of HERO have now started to spike higher back above its 50-day and it's quickly moving within range of triggering a major breakout trade. That trade will hit if HERO manages to take out some near-term overhead resistance levels at $4.60 to $4.68 and then above more resistance at $4.72 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in HERO as long as it's trending above those double bottom support zones and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 4.15 million shares. If that breakout triggers soon, then HERO will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $4.86 to $4.98. Any high-volume move above those levels will then give HERO a chance to re-test or possibly take out its 200-day moving average of $5.84.

SFX Entertainment

SFX Entertainment (SFXE) is engaged in the production live events and digital entertainment content that focuses on the electronic music culture and other festivals. This stock closed up 2.5% to $7.34 a share in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $7.15-$7.41

52-Week Range: $5.41-$13.39

Thursday's Volume: 482,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 780,419

From a technical perspective, SFXE rose modestly higher here right off its 50-day moving average of $7.13 with lighter-than-average volume. This move is quickly pushing shares of SFXE within range of triggering big breakout trade. That trade will hit if SFXE manages to take out Thursday's intraday high of $7.41 to some more key overhead resistance at $7.49 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in SFXE as long as it's trending above $7 or above $6.50 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 780,419 shares. If that breakout kicks off soon, then SFXE will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $8.14 to $8.57, or even $9.

Cache

Cache (CACH) operates as a mall-based and online woman's specialty retailer of apparel and accessories in the U.S. This stock closed flat to $1.75 a share in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $1.75-$1.84

52-Week Range: $1.15-$6.83

Thursday's Volume: 204,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 230,282

From a technical perspective, CACH moved within range of $1.84 on the upside and $1.75 on the downside in Thursday's trading session with decent volume. Despite the lack of movement to the upside, shares of CACH are still trending very close to triggering a major breakout trade. That trade will hit if CACH manages to take out some key near-term overhead resistance at $1.85 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in CACH as long as it's trending above some key near-term support at $1.72 and then once it sustains a move or close above $1.85 with volume that hits near or above 230,282 shares. If that breakout triggers soon, then CACH will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $2.62 to its 50-day moving average of $2.72. Any high-volume move above those levels will then give CACH a chance to tag its next major overhead resistance levels at $3.40 to $3.63.

To see more stocks that are making notable moves higher, check out the Stocks Under $10 Moving Higher portfolio on Stockpickr.

-- Written by Roberto Pedone in Delafield, Wis.


RELATED LINKS:



>>4 Big Stocks on Traders' Radars



>>3 Stocks Rising on Unusual Volume



>>Warren Buffett Is Sick of These 4 Stocks

Follow Stockpickr on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

At the time of publication, author had no positions in stocks mentioned.

Roberto Pedone, based out of Delafield, Wis., is an independent trader who focuses on technical analysis for small- and large-cap stocks, options, futures, commodities and currencies. Roberto studied international business at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, and he spent a year overseas studying business in Lubeck, Germany. His work has appeared on financial outlets including

CNBC.com and Forbes.com.

You can follow Pedone on Twitter at www.twitter.com/zerosum24 or @zerosum24.


15 Oil and Gas Stocks to Sell Now

RSS Logo Portfolio Grader Popular Posts: 15 Oil and Gas Stocks to Sell Now10 Best “Strong Buy” Stocks — EQM DAL BITA and more7 Biotechnology Stocks to Buy Now Recent Posts: Biggest Movers in Services Stocks Now – BIG GCO TKC ANN Hottest Basic Materials Stocks Now – ABX CIR IFF WIRE Biggest Movers in Consumer Cyclical Stocks Now – KORS TSLA TM GT View All Posts

The overall ratings of 15 oil and gas stocks are down on Portfolio Grader this week. Each of these rates a “D” (“sell”) or “F” overall (“strong sell”).

Crescent Point Energy Corp.’s () rating falls this week to an F (“strong sell”), down from last week’s D (“sell”). In Portfolio Grader’s specific subcategories of Earnings Revisions, Earnings Surprise, Cash Flow and Margin Growth, CPG also gets F’s. Shares of the stock have been changing hands at an unusually rapid pace, twice the rate of the week prior. The stock’s trailing PE Ratio is 109.50. .

Golar LNG Partners’ () rating falls to a D (“sell”) this week, down from C (“hold”) the week prior. Golar LNG Partners owns floating storage and regasification units and liquefied natural gas carriers. Shares of the stock have been trading at an exceptionally rapid pace, up fourfold from the week prior. .

Slipping from a D to an F rating, Cosan Limited Class A () takes a hit this week. Cosan is a fully integrated company in the renewable energy and infrastructure segments in Brazil. The stock gets F’s in Cash Flow and Margin Growth. Shares of the stock have been changing hands at an unusually rapid pace, up 589.9% from the week prior. The stock currently has a trailing PE Ratio of 38.60. .

Goodrich Petroleum Corporation () experiences a ratings drop this week, going from last week’s C to a D. Goodrich Petroleum explores, develops, produces and acquires oil and natural gas properties. The stock receives F’s in Earnings Growth, Earnings Revisions, Equity and Cash Flow. As of May 30, 2014, 33.1% of outstanding Goodrich Petroleum Corporation shares were held short. Shares of the stock are being traded at a very rapid pace, up 658.2% from the week prior. .

The rating of EXCO Resources, Inc. () declines this week from a D to an F. EXCO Resources is an oil and natural gas company involved in the exploration, exploitation, development and production of onshore North American oil and natural gas properties. The stock gets F’s in Earnings Surprise, Equity and Cash Flow. As of May 30, 2014, 12% of outstanding EXCO Resources, Inc. shares were held short. .

Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. () earns an F this week, moving down from last week’s grade of D. Calumet Specialty Products produces hydrocarbon products in North America. The stock receives F’s in Earnings Growth, Earnings Momentum and Earnings Revisions. Cash Flow and Margin Growth also get F’s. .

Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. () earns a D this week, falling from last week’s grade of C. Plains All American Pipeline is involved in interstate and intrastate crude oil pipeline transportation and crude oil terminalling storage activities. Shares of the stock have been trading at an exceptionally rapid pace, up threefold from the week prior. .

TransCanada Corporation’s () rating weakens this week, dropping to an F versus last week’s D. TransCanada develops and operates energy infrastructures, including natural gas pipelines. Shares of the stock have been changing hands at an unusually rapid pace, three times the rate of the week prior. The trailing PE Ratio for the stock is 29.80. .

This is a rough week for Enbridge (). The company’s rating falls to F from the previous week’s D. Enbridge is in the business of transportation and distribution of crude oil and natural gas primarily in Canada and the United States. The stock gets F’s in Earnings Growth, Earnings Momentum and Cash Flow. Trade volume is up 615% from the previous week. The stock has a trailing PE Ratio of 69.70. .

This week, StealthGas () drops from a C to a D rating. StealthGas offers marine transport services for liquefied petroleum gas producers and users. In Earnings Growth, Earnings Revisions, Earnings Surprise and Cash Flow the stock gets F’s. .

Ultrapar Participacoes S.A. Sponsored ADR () gets weaker ratings this week as last week’s D drops to an F. Ultrapar Participacoes is engaged in the fuel distribution and chemical businesses in Brazil. Shares of the stock have been trading at an exceptionally rapid pace, up twofold from the week prior. .

This week, Gevo’s () rating worsens to an F from the company’s D rating a week ago. Gevo operates as a technology development company for biobutanol. The stock gets F’s in Equity, Cash Flow and Sales Growth. As of May 30, 2014, 11.7% of outstanding Gevo shares were held short. Trade volume is up 1155.7% from the previous week. .

Slipping from a C to a D rating, PDC Energy () takes a hit this week. PDC Energy is an oil and gas company with drilling and production operations in the Rocky Mountains, the Appalachian Basin and Michigan. The stock gets F’s in Earnings Revisions and Cash Flow. As of May 30, 2014, 11.5% of outstanding PDC Energy shares were held short. .

This week, Chevron Corporation’s () rating worsens to an F from the company’s D rating a week ago. Chevron is an integrated energy company with operations in countries located around the world. Shares of the stock have been changing hands at an unusually rapid pace, four times the rate of the week prior. .

This is a rough week for Kinder Morgan, Inc. Class P (). The company’s rating falls to F from the previous week’s D. Kinder Morgan is a pipeline transportation and energy storage company. The stock currently has a trailing PE Ratio of 29.30. .

Louis Navellier’s proprietary Portfolio Grader stock ranking system assesses roughly 5,000 companies every week based on a number of fundamental and quantitative measures. Stocks are given a letter grade based on their results — with A being “strong buy,” and F being “strong sell.” Explore the tool here.

Ford issues four recalls involving 1.3M cars, SUVs

Ford issued four recalls Thursday covering 1.3 million vehicles in North America, most of them to fix a power steering defect in SUVs that have resulted in 20 reported accidents.

The biggest recall was of 915,216 Ford Escapes and its corporate sibling, the since-discontinued Mercury Mariner, from the 2008 to 2011 model years, over the steering issue. All of the compact SUVs were made at Ford's Kansas City plant and 736,407 are believed to be in the U.S., with most of the rest in Canada and Mexico.

A separate recall covered the same potential problem in the 2011 to 2013 full-size Explorer SUV made at Ford's Chicago plant. Ford says some 195,527 vehicles are involved, of which 177,747 are believed to be in the U.S.

The number of vehicles in the U.S. involved in Thurday's four recalls is just shy of the total number of vehicles in all of those issued by Ford in 2013. Last year, there were 16 recalls. This year, so far there are 11, says spokeswoman Kelli Felker.

Ford says it is aware of five accident reports involving a total of six injuries related to the defect in Escape and Mariner. On Explorer, there are reports of 15 low-speed accidents and two minor injuries.

Ford reports on both the Escape/Mariner and Explorer, the defect involves a glitch that could result in loss of power steering. The issue has been under investigation on the Escape within Ford since 2009, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration filing. Canadian authorities opened an investigation in 2011. In January, Ford came up with a procedure and parts that allowed dealers to fix the problem without replacing the entire steering column.

The Escape and Mariner problem involves a torque sensor inside the steering column. On Explorer, the issue is an electrical connection in the steering gear that can cut in or out. The result is the same on all the vehicles: the system can default to manual steering mode. In other words, no power steering. Since it takes a lot of effort to turn the whe! el, a crash can result, especially at lower speeds.

The other recalls included:

•2010 to 2014 Taurus. Ford is recalling the popular sedan because a light that illuminates the license plate can corrode. If it does, it can cause a short circuit that can cause a fire. Some 196,639 Taurus sedans are covered by the recall. There have been 18 reports of fire. In one instance, a driver was hurt when they tried to smother the fire with their bare hands.

•Floor mats. Ford sold 82,576 driver's side all-weather floor mats for 2006 to 2011 Fusion sedan, Lincoln MKZ and related vehicles that potentially could jam under gas pedals. Two accidents were reported with no injuries. That's the same issue that Toyota says was at the heart of its unintended-acceleration recalls a few years ago. It recalled 3.8 million vehicles over the issue in 2009.

Contributing: James R. Healey

Thursday, May 29, 2014

8 Purchases That Can Save You Hundreds of Dollars

Close-up of woman pouring coffee and looking at phone AlamyIf you're a coffee lover who buys a $4 latte everyday, an espresso machine or French press could save you more than $1,000 a year. If you're frugal, you might frequently find yourself worrying over purchases, asking yourself, "Is this too expensive?" But that's not the right mindset -- the questions you should be asking yourself are "What value does this have to me once I buy it?" and "Can this save me money?" In fact, there are many purchases -- cheap and expensive alike -- that can save you (or make you) money in the long run. Here are just a few that can save you hundreds or thousands over time. 1. A bike or transit pass. If you live in an area where you can forgo having a vehicle, you can save thousands of dollars a year. Just think, no more car payments or pricey repairs. And that's just the big stuff -- you won't have to pay for car washes or gas either. Don't think you can manage without a car for occasional errands? Many cities now have Zipcar or other car sharing programs, which allow members to rent cars for short time periods and low rates.

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Toll Brothers Posts Blowout Profits, But Don’t Sound an All-Clear for Housing

Twitter Logo LinkedIn Logo Google Plus Logo RSS Logo Dan Burrows Popular Posts: 5 Midcap Stocks to Buy for Growth AND Stability5 Stocks to Sell in JuneThe Top 10 S&P 500 Dividend Stocks for March Recent Posts: 5 Stocks to Sell in June Toll Brothers Posts Blowout Profits, But Don’t Sound an All-Clear for Housing Bank of America Dividend Request Is Looking Good (BAC) View All Posts

Outside of a financial crisis of historical proportions, you can’t really go wrong selling stuff to rich people.

toll brothers Toll Brothers Posts Blowout Profits, But Don't Sound an All Clear for HousingJust look at luxury homebuilder Toll Brothers (TOL), which reported soaring quarterly profits despite a slowdown in the housing market.

Rising mortgage rates and weaker housing data were pointing to housing market weakness ever before brutal winter weather gripped so much of the country earlier this year. That tampered the outlook for homebuilders, which have cooled off substantially after reaping the rewards of a big bounce back in 2011 and 2012.

But those fears appear to be unfounded — at least for high-end homebuilders — as Toll Brothers beat analysts’ fiscal second-quarter estimates for both earnings and revenue. It also should allay some anxiety felt by anyone holding TOL stock, which is on its way to breakeven for the year-to-date on the surprisingly strong earnings and outlook.

For the three months ended April 30, Toll Brothers said profit more than doubled by a wide margin, jumping 164% to $65.2 million, or 35 cents a share, from $24.7 million, or 14 cents a share, in the year-ago period. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters projected earnings of just 26 cents a share.

In more good news for TOL stock, the top line rose sharply to likewise eclipse Street estimates by a wide margin. Revenue increased 67% to $860.4 million. Analysts were looking for revenue of $828 million.

Toll Brothers Not Necessarily a Bellwether

It’s unclear how much of the good fortune at Toll Brothers extends to the broader collection of homebuilders. After all, Toll Brothers sells homes with an average price of $706,000, up from $577,000 a year ago. Indeed, the strong quarter was driven by price and volume gains.

But most rival homebuilders’ customers aren’t looking to spend anywhere near that level.

Furthermore, Toll Brothers — and TOL stock — benefits from building in the wealthy corridor from Boston to Washington, D.C. Toll Brothers also is developing condos-for-sale projects in the affluent New York City/northern New Jersey area, as well as Philadelphia.

By catering to the wealthy, Toll Brothers is able to enjoy rapid price escalation even as national home prices rise much more slowly.

On the other hand, housing recoveries tend to ebb and flow, according to Toll Brothers CEO Douglas C. Yearley Jr., so the slowdown may just be a normal pause for the market and the homebuilders. As Yearley said in a media release:

“We note that last cycle’s recovery, in the early 1990s, began with a period of rapid acceleration, followed by leveling, before further upward momentum. We believe that we are in a similar leveling period in the early stages of the housing recovery with significant pent-up demand building.”

Even if that’s the case, and there’s more upside for the housing market and homebuilders ahead, that doesn’t make Toll Brothers’ shares a buy on the latest news. TOL stock was already trading at a 26% premium to its competitors on a forward earnings basis, according to data from Thomson Reuters Stock Reports, so today’s good news appears to have been more than reflected in the stock’s price.

Toll Brothers might be too pricey to add to any position here, but the future looks bright enough that you sure wouldn’t want to sell it, either.

As of this writing, Dan Burrows did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned securities.

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Biggest auto recalls ever

5 most notorious auto recalls   5 most notorious auto recalls NEW YORK (CNNMoney) There's no question General Motors' 2014 recalls involve a huge number of cars. But even its largest recall this year -- of 2.6 million vehicles for a flaw connected to at least 13 deaths -- doesn't stack up to the biggest in history.

That distinction is held by Ford Motor, which in 1980 recalled 21 million vehicles from 10 model years for a problem that caused some vehicles to slip from park into reverse.

Do you think GM cars safe?

Records show Ford's solution for that problem, which investigators linked to 6,000 accidents and nearly 100 deaths, was to send drivers a warning sticker to put on the dashboard.

So far this year, General Motors (GM, Fortune 500) has recalled a total of 15.6 million vehicles worldwide. The total includes 2.6 million with an ignition switch flaw that can cause the vehicles to unexpectedly shut off and disable safety features.

The ignition switch recall is among the deadliest in recent years, and federal regulators say they believe additional fatalities will be connected to the flaw as the investigation continues.

None of its 30 recalls this year make the top 10, but GM does have four spots on the list, according to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration records:

2. Ford (F, Fortune 500) holds both the top spot and No. 2. In 1996, it recalled 7.9 million vehicles and replaced ignition switches, which could short circuit and cause a fire in the steering column.

3. General Motors' largest recall comes in at No. 3 on the NHTSA list. Investigators found over a dozen 1960s and 1970s models had faulty engine mounts that could cause the vehicle to accelerate unexpectedly. GM recalled 6.7 million cars and trucks and installed a restraining device to hold the engine in place.

4. GM's second-largest recall was for a suspension issue affecting 5.8 million vehicles from the late 1970s. The control arm, a critical part of the suspension that attaches the rear axle to the vehicle, could detach and the driver could lose control of the car.

5. In 2005, Ford recalled 4.5 million vehicles that could catch fire. It said the speed control feature could overheat, and while it prepared replacement parts, urged drivers to have the feature disconnected. Four years later, Ford issued a second speed control recall on a different batch of vehicles. That recall also totaled 4.5 million cars.

6. Toyota's unintended acceleration re! call totaled 4.4 million vehicles. It was started in 2009, but it has continued to haunt the automaker. Earlier this year, Toyota settled for $1.2 billion a federal investigation by admitting it misled investigators.

1970 ford recall

Twenty one million vehicles came off Ford production lines in the 1970s and 1980s with a safety defect.

7. In 1972, Ford recalled 4 million cars with faulty seat belts. It said the belt could detach from the buckle.

8. GM recalled just over 3.7 million early 1970s vehicles for an undercarriage design flaw. Small stones could get lodged in the steering apparatus and make it more difficult to steer the car, GM said.

9. Volkswagen and Honda each issued recalls for 3.7 million vehicles. In 1972, Volkswagen recalled 20 years of cars because a loose screw meant the windshield wipers could stop working. Honda recalled its cars in 1995 when a major seat belt manufacturer found design flaws that meant the buckle could crack.

10. In 2004, General Motors recalled more than 3.6 million trucks because cables holding the tailgate could snap. This meant someone standing or sitting on the tailgate could fall and be injured. To top of page

Is Shale Drilling a Sham?

Print Friendly

California has been a major oil-producing state for more than 100 years, although production there has been in decline for nearly 30 years. California also has one of the country's major oil and gas-bearing shale formations, the Monterey Shale in the San Joaquin Basin. In 2011 the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimated that the Monterey Shale holds 15 billion barrels of oil, which at that time represented 64 percent of the total estimated US shale oil resource.

But this past week, the Los Angeles Times reported that the EIA is about to slash its prior estimate of recoverable oil in the Monterey Shale by a whopping 96 percent. This is certainly a big news story, but some of the narratives promoted in the wake of this news have gotten a bit carried away.

140527telMontereyMap
Source: Los Angeles Times

There have been skeptics of the shale oil and gas boom ever since it began, and many of them spun the downward revision just like The Guardian did: Write-down of two-thirds of US shale oil explodes fracking myth. After five years of growing oil and gas production in the US, are the skeptics finally vindicated? Is it really possible that the shale boom is just a mirage or myth, as some have been claiming for years now?  

The Monterey is but one of the major shale, or tight oil/gas formations around the country. Other major oil-producing shales include the Eagle Ford in Texas and the Bakken Formation in North Dakota, and for natural gas production the Marcellus and Utica shales in the northeast, the Haynesville Shale that underlies parts of Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas, the Barnett Shale located in north central Texas (south and west of Dallas), and the Woodford Shale in Oklahoma. But the geologies of these shales can be very different.

140527telShaleMap
Oil and gas trapped in shale formations doesn't flow freely, so the rocks are hydraulically fractured ("fracked") to create fissures for the oil and gas to flow to the well bore. Over the past decade fracking was combined with horizontal drilling to make shale oil and gas production economical for the first time. Oil and gas production in shale plays across the US began to surge, and the US reversed a nearly 40-year decline in oil production.

Let's back up a step and review some terminology. An oil resource describes the total amount of oil in place, most of which typically can't be technically or economically recovered. For example, the Bakken Shale centered under North Dakota may contain several hundred billion barrels of oil (the resource), but what is economically recoverable may be less than 10 billion barrels. The portion that is technically AND economically recoverable is the proved reserve. Because of the requirement that the oil be economically recoverable, proved reserves are a function of oil prices and available technology.

While the most recent estimate from the EIA is that there are 3.2 billion barrels of proved reserves in the Bakken, that reserve would have to be written down to essentially zero if oil prices fell and remained depressed. This is an important point often missed when an oil or gas company, for example, has to write down reserves. There is often a misinterpretation that the company failed to find oil or gas where its geologists thought it existed, but more often it's that the oil or gas that is there requires a higher price before it can be classified as a proved reserve. Another way to think about it is that proved reserves are much larger with oil at $100/bbl than they are when oil is $50/bbl. So if oil and gas prices fall, companies may have to write down proved reserves (and vice versa).

To illustrate, accor! ding to t! he 2013 BP Statistical Review of World Energy, US proved crude reserves were 30.7 billion barrels at the end of 2002, when oil prices averaged around $25/bbl. Over the next 10 years, the US produced 27 billion barrels of oil — 88 percent of the 2002 proved reserve — and yet at the end of 2012 the proved reserves had grown to 35 billion barrels (with oil prices over $100/bbl). What happened? The shale oil boom happened, enabled by much higher prices and improved technology, and oil resources in North Dakota and Texas turned into proved reserves at the higher prices.

But the oil in the Monterey Shale was never in the proved reserves category. It is a case where there is a potentially big resource, but the geology is much more complex than in the Bakken or Eagle Ford. As a result California has not enjoyed the shale oil booms underway in North Dakota and Texas.

Between 2002 and 2012, California's proved reserves actually declined from 3.63 billion barrels to 2.97 billion barrels. Over that same time frame, North Dakota's proved reserves ballooned from 342 million barrels to 3.76 billion barrels (again, "resources" became proved reserves as fracking made production economical), while Texas' proved reserves went from 5.02 billion barrels to 9.61 billion barrels.

Why is the Monterey Shale different, and why were estimates slashed? The original estimates for the Monterey Shale assumed that the oil would be as easy to produce as it is in the Bakken or the Eagle Ford. In those locations, the resource is relatively horizontal and layered, so a drill can be turned to drill a horizontal well 5,000 to 10,000 feet in length. The Monterey Shale layers have been bent and fractured by California's seismic activity, such that the 2 mile horizontal wells in the Bakken don't translate to the Monterey. As oil companies gathered experience in the Monterey, it was recognized that it would be no Bakken — at least not with oil at current prices.

Many of the narratives in t! he wake o! f this revision pointed fingers at "the oil industry" for the inflated estimates of the oil held in the Monterey Shale. But guess who has been warning for years that the Monterey estimates were inflated? Actually, the oil industry.

One has to keep in mind is that the "oil industry" is not a unified, monolithic entity. Chevron (NYSE: CVX) has a major presence in California (it's also headquartered there), and is among those who have long expressed skepticism at the Monterey's potential. In a statement for CNBC story on the Monterey Shale more than a year ago, Chevron wrote "Chevron does not see the same level of promise in the Monterey Shale as other companies…we have not been encouraged by the results of the wells we have drilled into the formation."

There is an important lesson there. No all oil companies are the same, and one has to be careful of painting with a broad brush. Some oil companies are overleveraged. That doesn't extrapolate to the conclusion some have made that the shale boom is built on a house of (credit) cards. Some companies are investing far more than they will recoup any time soon, and some will have negative free cash flow for several years. These companies need prices to remain high, and for production to continue expanding. But that isn't universally true. There will be winners and losers (and that includes countries, some of which have huge shale resources but either challenging geologies or insufficient water for fracking).  

So I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the shale boom on the basis of the Monterey revision. In contrast to the downsized estimate for Monterey, last year the US Geological Survey (USGS) more than doubled its estimate of recoverable oil in the Williston Basin (home to the Bakken) on the basis of field results — the same process that led to the downward Monterey revision. Was this widely reported by those who are now gleefully calling the shale boom a myth? If not, I would argue that they aren't being ent! irely obj! ective, and are falling victim to confirmation bias.

Yes, this shale boom will inevitably end. And yes, we still have to keep in perspective that oil is a depleting resource, and we need to continue to plan for the ultimate depletion of that resource. But we also have to acknowledge reality. It's not a myth that since 2008 US oil production has been rising at its fastest rate in history. It's not a myth that North Dakota has had a 10-fold increase in oil production in 10 years, or that Texas oil production has gone up by nearly 2 million barrels per day in four years. If you have shunned shale oil and gas companies because you have been convinced that this boom is a myth, you have missed out on a lot of very real opportunities.

(Follow Robert Rapier on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook.)

Top 10 Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades: Apache, Nokia, Verizon and More

Labor Day is behind us and attendance should be starting back with interest in the markets again. Each morning 24/7 Wall St. reviews literally dozens and dozens of Wall Street analyst research reports. The aim is to find fresh ideas for investors and traders, for stocks to buy and stocks to sell. These are this Tuesday’s top Wall Street analyst upgrades, downgrades and initiations.

Apache Corp. (NYSE: APA) was raised to Buy at Mizuho Securities, and the price target was raised to $100 from $90. Its price target was raised to $113 from $106 at Canaccord Genuity. This was also named as a below book value stock in our recent screenings as well.

First American Financial Corp. (NYSE: FAF) was raised to Outperform from Market Perform at Keefe Bruyette & Woods.

Fidelity National Financial Inc. (NYSE: FNF) was raised to Outperform from Market Perform at Keefe Bruyette & Woods.

Finish Line Inc. (NASDAQ: FINL) was raised to Buy from Neutral at Janney Capital Markets.

Intrexon Corp. (NYSE: XON) was started as Buy at Mizuho Securities, started as Equal Weight at Barclays and started as Overweight at J.P. Morgan.

Nokia Corp. (NYSE: NOK) was raised to Hold from Sell at Deutsche Bank, raised to Neutral from Underperform at Credit Suisse and
Canaccord Genuity raised its price target to $5.50 from $3.30.

Transocean Ltd. Co. (NYSE: RIG) was maintained as Buy but the price target was lowered by $6 to $56 at Argus.

Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) was raised to Outperform from Market Perform at RBC Capital Markets.

Williams-Sonoma Inc. (NYSE: WSM) was downgraded to Hold from Buy at Canaccord Genuity.

World Point Terminals L.P. (NYSE: WPT) was initiated as Outperform with a $23 price target at Credit Suisse.

See also more analyst upgrades and downgrades for Tuesday.

SAC to pay record $1.8B in insider trading case

The giant hedge fund SAC Capital capitulated to federal prosecutors in a plea deal announced Monday, agreeing to plead guilty to every count of an insider-trading indictment issued in July, pay $1.8 billion in fines, and close its investment advisory business.

The deal was disclosed in a letter from Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, to two judges overseeing the case. The agreement will let SAC principal Steven A. Cohen continue to manage his personal fortune, estimated at $8 billion.

Prosecutors alleged that SAC leaders created a culture that enabled widespread insider trading by its employees, in stocks such as pharmaceutical maker Elan and a slew of technology companies including chipmakers Intel and Advanced Micro Devices, as well as consumer companies like Yahoo and BlackBerry. The government said top SAC leaders ignored signs that their employees were suggesting trades based on illegal tips.

``The government believes the proposed global resolution is fair, reasonable and firmly promotes the interests of justice, deterrence and respect for the law,'' Bharara and three other Justice Department attorneys wrote in the letter. ``The aggregate $1.8 billion financial penalty is -- to the Government's knowledge -- the largest financial penalty in history for insider trading offenses.'

A federal grand jury indicted SAC and three affiliates in July, charging them with wire fraud and securities fraud. The 41-page indictment and prosecutors depicted a corporate structure and culture in which Cohen sat at the center of a web of portfolio managers and research analysts, systematically collecting and trading on information he should have suspected was illegally gathered from employees of publicly traded firms such as Intel, Dell and Yahoo.

Citing numerous examples of "institutional indifference" to the alleged unlawful conduct, the indictment charged that the trading scheme "was substantial, pervasive and on a scale without known precedent in the hedg! e fund industry."

Along with the criminal charges of wire fraud and securities fraud, federal prosecutors filed a civil forfeiture complaint seeking to recover illegal gains from insider-trading offenses. The complaint also seeks to impose money-laundering penalties against the hedge fund and its affiliates for allegedly commingling insider-trading profits with other cash in the funds.

According to the indictment, portfolio managers and research analysts "engaged in a pattern of obtaining inside information from dozens of publicly traded companies across multiple industry sectors." The company allegedly:

• Sought to hire portfolio managers and analysts "with proven access to public company contacts likely to possess inside information."

• Gave portfolio managers financial incentives to give Cohen recommendations about "high conviction" trading ideas in which they had an "edge" on other investors. But the managers weren't "questioned when making trading recommendations that appeared to be based on inside information," the indictment charged.

• Failed to use effective compliance procedures or practices to prevent portfolio managers and analysts from engaging in insider trading. SAC managers on several occasions failed to refer suspicious trading recommendations to the company's compliance department for investigation, the indictment charged.

The portfolio managers and research analysts "were required to share their best investment ideas with the SAC owner" — Cohen — "while indications that those ideas were based on inside information were often ignored" by the funds' management, the indictment also alleged.

SAC Capital and CR Intrinsic, another Cohen affiliate, earlier this year agreed to pay the SEC a record $616 million in penalties to resolve civil insider-trading charges against the firms. The $1.8 billion in penalties announced Monday includes credit for the earlier amount.

Additionally, the SEC on July 19 filed civil administrative charges ag! ainst Coh! en himself, alleging that he "failed reasonably to supervise" two senior portfolio managers who themselves have been been hit with insider-trading charges and are awaiting trial.

Contributing: Kevin McCoy

Monday, May 26, 2014

Top 10 Highest-Paid Entry-Level Jobs

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- It's graduation season and hordes of educated youth will soon be in competition for the limited number of entry-level jobs available on the job market. While the newly-graduated will have to start from the bottom to get to the top, the bottom needn't be the lowest-paid jobs offered.

TheStreet analyzed figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to determine the top 10 positions with the highest earning potential for the entry-level candidates of the next generation of workers.

N.B. All figures are sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

#1: Occupational therapist Job description: Occupational therapists treat injured or ill patients, assisting them in their physical recovery by helping them improve various tasks and habits required in everyday life. Earning power: $75,400 per year (median pay based on BLS 2012 data) Education requirements: Master's degree

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Morning MoneyBeat: Putting a Bow on Earnings Season

Morning MoneyBeat is the Journal’s pre-market primer packed with market updates, insights and must-read news links. Send us tips, suggestions and complaints: steven.russolillo@wsj.com

Click here to receive this morning newsletter via email

MARKET SNAP: At 6:00 a.m. ET, S&P 500 futures up 0.3%. 10-Year Treasury yield higher at 2.52%. Nymex up 77 cents at $103.10. Gold 0.1% lower at $1293.30. In Europe, FTSE 100 down 0.2%, DAX up 0.2% and CAC 40 flat. In Asia, Nikkei 225 down 0.2% and Hang Seng up 0.01%.

WATCH FOR:  No major economic data on dap. American Eagle, Booz Allen, Eaton Vance(EV), Hormel Foods(HRL), L Brands(LB), Lowe's(LOW), NetApp, PetSmart(PETM), Renren(RENN), Sina, Target, Tiffany, Trina Solar(TSL) and Williams-Sonoma(WSM) are among companies scheduled to report quarterly results.

THE BREAKFAST BRIEFING

Another earnings season is in the books. The good news: it wasn't nearly as bad as initially feared. The bad: profit growth and forward guidance don’t offer much to celebrate.

Companies have struck a cautious tone on their earnings projections for the current quarter and the rest of the year. With the economy stuck in a slow slog, the Federal Reserve paring back its stimulus and talk of rate increases ramping up, investors say earnings need to improve to justify the stock market’s latest run toward record levels.

Such a pickup may not be in the cards.

Some 473 companies in the S&P 500, or about 95% of the index, have reported quarterly results as of Tuesday morning. First-quarter profits rose just 2.0% from a year ago, according to John Butters, senior earnings analyst at FactSet. That's better than the 1.3% decline analysts predicted heading into earnings season, but it's still well below the previous quarter's 8.5% growth rate.

Many companies blamed the cold, dreary winter weather for lackluster results. U.S. economic growth was barely positive in the first three months of the year, so poor corporate results get a pass. But as the weather improves, the hope is earnings will follow suit. Analysts forecast second-quarter profit growth of 6%, FactSet data show. Those projections could be too optimistic.

About three of every four companies that have given quarterly outlooks so far have predicted results below Wall Street estimates. That level of caution is actually better than the past few quarters, but it's still a historically high figure for negative guidance.

That's making some investors nervous.

Krishna Memani, chief investment officer at Oppenheimer Funds, which oversees about $237 billion, said investors are concerned that, after a weather-induced slowdown in the first quarter, there is still no clear sign the economy has started accelerating in the second quarter.

“We were looking for a recovery in retail sales and the economy, and we’re just not seeing it,” Mr. Memani told the WSJ.

Meanwhile, worries about interest rates are also weighing on the market. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia President Charles Plosser, a noted hawk, said Tuesday that the central bank may have to boost interest rates earlier than anticipated. The Fed has been gradually paring back on its highly stimulative bond-buying program this year, but most expect the Fed to keep short-term interest rates anchored near zero well into 2015.

Those comments helped spark a retreat in the stock market Tuesday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average tumbled 137 points, 0r 0.8%, to 16374, its lowest close since April 25.

To be sure, the blue-chip average still only sits 2% off its all-time high. Volatility remains historically low, deal activity has picked up and few economists are forecasting a recession anytime soon. That backdrop suggests any decline in the stock market will likely be short and shallow.

Trading volume is expected to be light through the remainder of the week ahead of Memorial Day weekend (markets are closed Monday), which could make stocks susceptible to bigger swings.

But from a longer-term perspective, any substantial advance for U.S. stocks beyond these record levels will need to be supported by strong earnings growth. With the Fed pulling back on stimulus and the economy bouncing back from the brutally cold winter, it’s time for companies to step up.

Morning MoneyBeat Daily Factoid: On this day in 1980, the second "Star Wars" movie–"The Empire Strikes Back"–was released.

-By Steven Russolillo; follow him on Twitter @srussolillo.

–Tomi Kilgore contributed to this post.

STOCKS TO WATCH

Target is projected to report first-quarter earnings of 71 cents a share, according to a consensus survey by FactSet. "We remain concerned the departure of Gregg Steinhafel may foreshadow greater than expected difficulties in both markets. While the appointment of a new CEO and a resetting of expectations could prove a positive catalyst, the stock will likely confront further near-term challenges," said Bob Summers at Susquehanna International in a note.

Lowe's is forecast to post first-quarter earnings of 60 cents a share.

Williams-Sonoma is likely to report earnings of 44 cents a share in the first quarter. Analysts at UBS on Tuesday raised the stock's price target to $65 from $63 and maintained its rating at neutral.

MUST READS (LINKS)

Debt Rises in Leveraged Buyouts Despite Warnings: “Regulators have impressed upon banks that they aren’t happy with the amount of loans fueling takeovers by private-equity firms.”

Housing Investors Settle Into a Holding Pattern: “With bargains less plentiful, large housing investors are slowing property purchases and turning their focus to generating steady income from tenants.”

Credit Suisse CEO Nearly Lost Job During Tax Probe: “As a yearslong U.S. tax probe dragged on in recent months, board members at Credit Suisse(CSGN.VX) mulled actions that likely would have cost CEO Brady Dougan his job.”

Ahead of the Tape: With Target, It Helps to Aim Low: “Target’s perverse advantage going into its earnings report is that investors don’t expect much.”

GOP Sees Primaries Taming the Tea Party: “Republican leaders made significant strides in their effort to defang—or at least co-opt—the tea party as an insurgent political force.”

BOE Minutes Indicate Emerging Divisions: ”For some Bank of England officials, the time to raise interest rates in the U.K. is getting closer, as minutes of the central bank’s May meeting record ‘a variety of views on the appropriate path of monetary policy.’”

Demand High as Fannie Mae(FNMA) Sets Price Range for Risky Securities: “Investors are clamoring to buy mortgage giant Fannie Mae’s $1.6 billion offering of derivative debt securities tied to the value of some of the riskiest mortgages it guarantees.”

Heard on the Street: Deal-Making Patience May Prove Dish’s Virtue: “AT&T’s offer to buy DirecTV(DTV) seems to narrow options for Dish. But Chairman Charlie Ergen still has cards to play.”

Copper Mining Squeezed by Tight Water Supply: “Freeport-McMoRan, one of the world’s top copper miners, has invested heavily to secure access to water as copper prices have fallen 32% from highs in 2011.”

Workers Try a New Tactic in Minimum-Wage Fight: “Stymied by Congress on their minimum-wage push, low-wage workers and even Obama administration officials are pleading for U.S. companies from McDonald's(MCD) to Wal-Mart(WMT) to raise wages voluntarily.”

Heard on the Street: Microsoft's(MSFT) Tablet Only Scratches the Surface: “Microsoft’s latest Surface tablet goes in an unexpected direction, but still isn’t enough to assure the tech giant a leading mobile-computing role.”

 

 

Thursday, May 22, 2014

Rieder: A bravura performance by Jill Abramson

Jill Abramson crushed it.

In her first public appearance since her unceremonious ouster as executive editor of The New York Times last Wednesday, Abramson was masterful Monday as she gave the commencement address at Wake Forest University.

Over the weekend, Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr., very much on the defensive for the way he pushed Abramson out the door, was harshly critical of the woman he chose less than three years ago to run the newsroom of the nation's preeminent news outlet.

"I concluded that her management of the newsroom was simply not working out," he said in a statement. "During her tenure, I heard repeatedly from her newsroom colleagues, women and men, about a series of issues, including arbitrary decision-making, a failure to consult and bring colleagues with her, inadequate communication and the public mistreatment of colleagues."

But in her address to the graduating Demon Deacons, Abramson stayed very much on the high road.

Rather than returning fire, rather than bemoaning her fate, Abramson continued to profess her allegiance to the Times.

She described the paper as an "important and irreplaceable institution." As for that New York Times "T" she has tattooed on her back, she said there's "not a chance" she'll have it removed.

The newly unemployed editor is known for her sometimes prickly demeanor. But she was sunny and self-deprecating in her commencement remarks. She had just the right touch.

"Losing a job you love hurts," she said. She said she didn't know what would come next for her, which, she said, put her in the same boat as many of the graduates.

REM RIEDER: Challenges face Baquet at New York Times

While it seems clear that there were many problems with Abramson's management style, she has overwhelmed Sulzberger in the court of public opinion since her abrupt departure.

In fact, it's hard to imagine how the Times publisher, who also is chairman of the New York Times Co., could have handled the sacking of! Abramson much worse.

Back in 2003, when Howell Raines, another executive editor chosen by Sulzberger, was dispatched, he got a ceremony in the newsroom. This after his reign of terror completely demoralized the proud newsroom and after the Jayson Blair plagiarism and fabrication scandal humiliated the newspaper.

Jill Abramson, former executive editor at the New York Times walks in with faculty and staff during commencement ceremonies for Wake Forest University on May 19.(Photo: Chris Keane, Getty Images)

But last Wednesday, when Sulzberger announced that Abramson was out and managing editor Dean Baquet was being promoted to succeed her, Abramson was nowhere to be seen. There was no transition period. Abramson was gone, baby, gone. The Times couldn't wait to excise her name from the masthead.

The bloodiness of her execution suggested she was guilty of something truly scandalous. Yet there's no hint of that.

It may well be that Abramson didn't want to play along, But that's all the more reason for handling the situation deftly. Sulzberger should have consulted some PR pros. The optics for the Times have been brutal.

It's important to remember that whatever her failings, Abramson is a terrific journalist. The paper performed very well during her tenure.

A major factor in shaping the post-firing discussion was a series of pieces by New Yorker media writer Ken Auletta saying one of the keys to Abramson's demise was her belief that she was being paid less than her male predecessor, and that she had lawyered up.

While the Times denies that she was paid less than Bill Keller, the notion that Abramson was a victim of sexism and was bounced because she was fighting back rapidly became a widely! accepted! narrative.

This theme has particular resonance since Abramson, as the first woman to serve as the top editor at The New York Times, is an important symbol for many women.

Suddenly the two-fisted Abramson became a martyr.

While problems with Abramson as a manager were hardly new, it seems that her efforts to bring in Janine Gibson of The Guardian as a co-managing editor for digital was the final straw for Sulzberger. Abramson apparently neglected to tell Baquet that that was what she had in mind for Gibson, and when he found out about, he was understandably apoplectic.

There's no question that the executive editor of a newspaper serves at the pleasure of the publisher. And it's crucial for them to be on the same page. There also seems little doubt that Abramson had alienated a lot of people. (Highly regarded Times media columnist David Carr concurs that Abramson had "lost" the staff.)

But the way the situation is playing out has been dreadful for the Times and Sulzberger. Abramson's Wake Forest gig didn't make things any easier.

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Boeing Wants to Be Like Apple

Boeing (BA) is meeting with investors today–and investors appear to like what they hear.

AP

Shares of Boeing have gained 0.9% to $130.73 after CEO Jim McNerney said the company would look to be more like Apple (AAPL), with new product developments added over time–like Apple does with the iPad–rather than in one big, high-risk “moonshot.” Boeing also said that it would cut costs by another $2.1 billion from its defense business.

RBC Capital Markets’ Robert Stallard doesn’t think the cost-cutting will come solely at the expense of Boeing’s suppliers. He explains:

[The] emphasis put on supplier costs is not really ‘new’ – it’s an ongoing process. We are actually happy to hear multiple examples of where Boeing has been working with suppliers to take out cost as well, so this is not just a price cut. Ultimately, this should help many suppliers to preserve margins, even with further OE price pressure.

While share of Boeing have jumped, Apple has ticked up just 0.1% to $605.20.

5 Hated Earnings Stocks You Should Love

DELAFIELD, Wis. (Stockpickr) -- Short-sellers hate being caught short a stock that reports a blowout quarter. When this happens, we often see a tradable short squeeze develop as the bears rush to cover their positions to avoid big losses. Even the best short-sellers know that it's never a great idea to stay short once a bullish earnings report sparks a big short-covering rally.

>>5 Rocket Stocks Ready for Blastoff

This is why I scan the market for heavily shorted stocks that are about to report earnings. You only need to find a few of these stocks in a year to help enhance your portfolio returns -- the gains become so outsized in such a short time frame that your profits add up quickly.

That said, let's not forget that stocks are heavily shorted for a reason, so you have to use trading discipline and sound money management when playing earnings short-squeeze candidates. It's important that you don't go betting the farm on these plays and that you manage your risk accordingly. Sometimes the best play is to wait for the stock to break out following the report before you jump in to profit off a short squeeze. This way, you're letting the trend emerge after the market has digested all of the news.

Of course, sometimes the stock is going to be in such high demand that you risk missing a lot of the move by waiting. That's why it can be worth betting prior to the report -- but only if the stock is acting technically very bullish and you have a very strong conviction that it is going to rip higher. Just remember that even when you have that conviction and have done your due diligence, the stock can still get hammered if The Street doesn't like the numbers or guidance.

>>5 Stocks Ready to Break Out

If you do decide to bet ahead of a quarter, then you might want to use options to limit your capital exposure. Heavily shorted stocks are usually the names that make the biggest post-earnings moves and have the most volatility. I personally prefer to wait until all the earnings-related news is out for a heavily shorted stock and then jump in and trade the prevailing trend.

With that in mind, here's a look at several stocks that could experience big short squeezes when they report earnings this week.

Bon-Ton Stores

My first earnings short-squeeze play is department stores player Bon-Ton Stores (BONT), which is set to release numbers on Thursday before the market open. Wall Street analysts, on average, expect Bon-Ton Stores to report revenue of $642.16 million on a loss of $1.23 per share.

Just this morning, Buckingham said Bon-Ton's first-quarter results could be a positive catalyst for the stock and recommended buying the stock ahead of the quarter.

>>4 Huge Stocks on Traders' Radars

The current short interest as a percentage of the float for Bon-Ton Stores is extremely high at 47.5%. That means that out of the 10.68 million shares in the tradable float, 5.01 million shares are sold short by the bears. The bears have also been increasing their bets from the last reporting period by 0.4%, or by about 18,808 shares. If the bears get caught pressing their bets into a strong quarter, then shares of BONT could easily jump sharply higher post-earnings as the bears rush to cover some of their bets.

From a technical perspective, BONT is currently trending below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, which is bearish. This stock has been trending sideways and consolidating for the last two months and change, with shares moving between $9.55 on the downside and $12.04 on the upside. Any high-volume move above the upper-end of its recent range post-earnings could easily trigger a major breakout trade for shares of BONT.

If you're bullish on BONT, then I would wait until after its report and look for long-biased trades if this stock manages to break out above some near-term overhead resistance levels at $11.01 to $11.70 a share and then once it clears more resistance at $11.90 to $12.04 a a share with high volume. Look for volume on that move that hits near or above its three-month average volume of 501,402 shares. If that breakout hits, then BONT will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance level near $14 a share. Any high-volume move above $14 will then give BONT a chance to re-fill some of its previous gap-down-day zone from January that started near $16 a share.

I would simply avoid BONT or look for short-biased trades if after earnings it fails to trigger that breakout and then drops back below some key near-term support levels at $9.55 to its 52-week low of $9.12 a share with high volume. If we get that move, then BONT will set up to enter new 52-week-low territory, which is bearish technical price action.

21Vianet Group

Another potential earnings short-squeeze trade idea is carrier-neutral Internet data center services provider 21Vianet Group (VNET), which is set to release its numbers on Thursday after the market close. Wall Street analysts, on average, expect 21Vianet Group to report revenue $93.53 million on earnings of 10 cents per share.

>>3 Stocks Spiking on Unusual Volume

The current short interest as a percentage of the float for 21Vianet Group is notable at 4.5%. That means that out of the 41.56 million shares in the tradable float, 1.94 million shares are sold short by the bears. The bears have also been increasing their bets from the last reporting period by 15.1%, or by about 254,000 shares. If the bears get caught pressing their bets into a bullish quarter, then shares of VNET could easily surge sharply higher post-earnings as the shorts rush to cover some of their trades.

From a technical perspective, VNET is currently trending above its 200-day moving average and just below its 50-day moving average, which is neutral trendwise. This stock has been uptrending a bit for the last few weeks, with shares moving higher from its low of $22.59 to its recent high of $27.37 a share. During that move, shares of VNET have been making mostly higher lows and higher highs, which is bullish technical price action. That move has now pushed shares of VNET within range of triggering a big breakout trade post-earnings.

If you're in the bull camp on VNET, then I would wait until after its report and look for long-biased trades if this stock manages to break out above some near-term overhead resistance levels at $27.37 to $28.15 a share with high volume. Look for volume on that move that hits near or above its three-month average action of 1.02 million shares. If that breakout hits post-earnings, then VNET will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $30.28 to its 52-week high at $32.19 a share. Any high-volume move above $32.19 will then push shares of VNET into new 52-week-high territory, which is bullish technical price action.

I would simply avoid VNET or look for short-biased trades if after earnings it fails to trigger that breakout and then drops back below some key near-term support at $25.04 a share with high volume. If we get that move, then VNET will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major support levels at $22.59 to its 200-day moving average of $21.11 a share.

Aeropostale

Another potential earnings short-squeeze candidate is mall-based specialty retailer Aeropostale (ARO), which is set to release numbers on Thursday after the market close. Wall Street analysts, on average, expect Aeropostale to report revenue of $409.90 million on a loss of 71 cents per share.

>>Sell These 5 Toxic Stocks Before It's Too Late

The current short interest as a percentage of the float for Aeropostale is extremely high at 40.6%. That means that out of the 51.41 million shares in the tradable float, 20.90 million shares are sold short by the bears. If the bulls get the earnings news they're looking for, then shares of ARO could easily experience a monster short-squeeze post-earning as the bears rush to cover some of their trades.

From a technical perspective, ARO is currently trending below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, which is bearish. This stock recently formed a double bottom chart pattern $4.30 to $4.31 a share. If that major support level can hold post-earnings, then shares of ARO could easily explode higher and trigger a major breakout trade above some key near-term overhead resistance levels.

If you're bullish on ARO, then I would wait until after its report and look for long-biased trades if this stock manages to break out above some near-term overhead resistance levels at $4.94 to $5.09 a share with high volume. Look for volume on that move that hits near or above its three-month average action of 3.93 million shares. If that breakout begins post-earnings, then AEO will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $5.43 to $6.50 a share. Any high-volume move above $6.50 will then give ARO a chance to re-fill some of its previous gap-down-day zone from March that started at $7.50 a share.

I would avoid ARO or look for short-biased trades if after earnings it fails to trigger that breakout and then drops back below some key near-term support levels at $4.31 to its 52-week low of $4.30 a share with high volume. If we get that move, then AEO will set up to enter new 52-week-low territory, which is bearish technical price action.

Best Buy

Another earnings short-squeeze prospect is Best Buy (BBY), a multi-national, multi-channel retailer of technology products, which is set to release numbers on Thursday before the market open. Wall Street analysts, on average, expect Best Buy to report revenue of $9.20 billion on earnings of 20 cents per share.

>>5 Stocks Under $10 Set to Soar

The current short interest as a percentage of the float for Best Buy is very high at 10.4%. That means that out of the 286.89 million shares in the tradable float, 29.50 million shares are sold short by the bears. If Best Buy can deliver the earnings news the bulls are looking for, then shares of BBY could easily rip sharply higher post-earnings as the shorts rush to cover some of their bets.

From a technical perspective, BBY is currently trending below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, which is bearish. This stock has been trending sideways and consolidating for the last two months and change, with shares moving between $23.87 on the downside and $27.93 on the upside. Any high-volume move above the upper-end of its recent range post-earnings could trigger a major breakout trade for shares of BBY.

If you're bullish on BBY, then I would wait until after its report and look for long-biased trades if this stock manages to break out above some near-term overhead resistance levels at $26.75 to $27.93 a share and then once it takes out more key resistance at 28.02 a share with high volume. Look for volume on that move that hits near or above its three-month average action of 6.45 million shares. If that breakout materializes post-earnings, then BBY will set up to re-fill some of its previous gap-down-day zone from January that started just above $36 a share.

I would simply avoid BBY or look for short-biased trades if after earnings it fails to trigger that breakout and then drops back below some key near-term support levels at $25.01 to $23.87 a share with high volume. If we get that move, then BBY will set up to re-test or possibly take out its 52-week low of $22.15 a share. Any high-volume move below that level will then push shares of BBY into new 52-week-low territory, which is bearish technical price action.

Aruba Networks

My final earnings short-squeeze play is enterprise mobility solutions provider Aruba Networks (ARUN), which is set to release numbers on Thursday after the market close Wall Street analysts, on average, expect Aruba Networks to report revenue of $180.72 million on earnings of 20 cents per share.

Just yesterday, Imperial Capital initiated coverage on shares of Aruba Networks with an outperform rating and a $23 per share price target. Also, two weeks ago Pacific Crest said jt expects Aruba's revenue growth to accelerate to 20%. The firm has a $27 per share price target and an outperform rating on the stock.

The current short interest as a percentage of the float for Aruba Networks is pretty high at 11.7%. That means that out of the 102.04 million shares in the tradable float, 11.98 million shares are sold short by the bears. If this company can deliver the earnings news the bulls are looking for, then shares of ARUN could easily jump sharply higher post-earnings as the bears rush to cover some of their positions.

From a technical perspective, ARUN is currently trending above its 200-day moving average and just below its 50-day moving average, which is neutral trendwise. This stock is just starting to flirt with its 50-day moving average at $19.69 a share and it's starting to push within range of triggering a big breakout trade post-earnings above some key near-term overhead resistance levels.

If you're in the bull camp on ARUN, then I would wait until after its report and look for long-biased trades if this stock manages to break out above some near-term overhead resistance levels at $20.99 to $21.21 a share and then once it clears more resistance at $22.10 a share with high volume. Look for volume on that move that hits near or above its three-month average action of 1.93 million shares. If that breakout triggers post-earnings, then ARUN will set up to re-test or possibly take out its 52-week high at $23.58 a share. Any high-volume move above that level will then give ARUN a chance to tag its next major overhead resistance level at $26.78 a share.

I would avoid ARUN or look for short-biased trades if after earnings it fails to trigger that breakout, and then drops back below its 200-day moving average at $18.83 a share and then below more support at $18.04 a share with high volume. If we get that move, then ARUN will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major support levels at $17 to $15.97 a share. Any high-volume move below those levels will then give ARUN a chance to tag $14 a share.

To see more potential earnings short squeeze plays, check out the Earnings Short-Squeeze Plays portfolio on Stockpickr.

-- Written by Roberto Pedone in Delafield, Wis.


RELATED LINKS:



>>This Beaten-Down Stock Ready to Rebound



>>3 Stocks Rising on Big Volume



>>5 Big Stocks to Trade for Gains This Summer

Follow Stockpickr on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

At the time of publication, author had no positions in stocks mentioned.

Roberto Pedone, based out of Delafield, Wis., is an independent trader who focuses on technical analysis for small- and large-cap stocks, options, futures, commodities and currencies. Roberto studied international business at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, and he spent a year overseas studying business in Lubeck, Germany. His work has appeared on financial outlets including

CNBC.com and Forbes.com.

You can follow Pedone on Twitter at www.twitter.com/zerosum24 or @zerosum24.


Monday, May 19, 2014

Glu Mobile Is a Better Buy Than Zynga

The mobile gaming market is a hit-or-miss industry and this volatility has taken its toll on many game-developing companies over the past few years. Companies like Zynga (ZNGA) and Glu Mobile (GLUU) have fallen prey to this uncertainty due to their inability to consistently create attractive games. Consequently, stocks of both companies have consistently tumbled since they went public.

However, it seems like this trend is changing as both Zynga and Glu have appreciated considerably in the last few months. But will the companies be able to sustain this run in 2014? Let's find out.

Glu Mobile's Impressive Plans

Glu Mobile's run-up in the stock price has come solely because of the company's stellar quarterly results. Glu delivered record quarterly revenue of $42.8 million, up 62% year over year, while adjusted EBITDA came in at $6 million. The company thrashed Wall Street estimates and even revised its top- and bottom-line guidance upward. Although Glu's shares have shot up nearly 18% in 2014, it still has more upside potential.

The flavors of the mobile gaming market change habitually as gamers tend to get bored within a few months of playing any game (you don't play Angry Birds anymore, do you?). Therefore, it's important for any company to either constantly come up with chart-topping games or make regular updates to prolong the popularity of existing games. The latter seems to be easier to execute and that is exactly what Glu Mobile is doing.

Glu's success was largely driven by the success of its Deer Hunter 2014 title, so the company will be making content updates in the coming quarters to ensure that gamers don't lose interest. In addition, it will also launch the sequels of its famous Frontline Commando and Contract Killer franchises.

Also, Apple (AAPL)'s contract with China Mobile is a likely tailwind for Glu as Apple's App Store contributed to close to 64% to Glu Mobile's revenue. Analysts predict that Apple will sell an additional 20 million phones in China in 2014, and this can boost Glu Mobile's sales as well. In addition, China's smart devices gaming industry is growing at a rapid pace. The nation's mobile games market jumped over 370% year-over-year in 2013 to nearly $2 billion and is expected to grow another 94% in 2014.

As evident from the above chart, the Chinese smart devices gaming market will continue to grow at an overwhelming pace for at least a few years. Thus, the Apple-China Mobile tie-up can be a massive growth driver for Glu.

Moreover, Glu Mobile will be pumping out 30 games in 2014 to benefit from the growth opportunity and what makes this fact even more impressive is that the company will achieve this feat with a small workforce of 521 people. Given that it has such competent employees, it is well set to sustain its run in the foreseeable future.

Zynga Looks Dubious

Like Glu, Zynga also witnessed a decent run-up in its share price in 2013. Its fortunes turned around when Don Mattrick replaced Mark Pincus as the CEO. The company managed to beat analysts' estimates in the last two quarters. However, whether it will sustain this trend is yet to be seen.

The primary reason behind Zynga's recent success were cost-cutting initiatives and reduction in its workforce. The company sacked 520 employees in mid-2013 and continued down the same road by slashing nearly 15% of its workforce in January 2014.

While there's nothing wrong in reducing losses, Zynga cannot continue doing this forever. It will have to consistently come up with chart-topping games in order to return to profitability. The $527 million acquisition on NaturalMotion may be a step in the right direction, but the breakeven line is far, far away and there's still a long way to go before Zynga benefits from this purchase.

Moreover, you should keep in mind that Zynga's last high-profile acquisition of OMGPOP ended in a big disaster as the company lost a whopping $528,000 on a daily basis because of this acquisition. Thus, Zynga needs to concentrate more on game developing to achieve long-term success. As of now, Glu Mobile looks a better bet out of the two.

Takeaway

It is clear that Glu is the gaming stock to buy right now as opposed to Zynga. Zynga could be a good buy in the future if the company comes up with chart-topping games, but until then, investors should stay away.

Currently 0.00/512345

Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes)

Email FeedsSubscribe via Email RSS FeedsSubscribe RSS Comments Please leave your comment:
More GuruFocus Links
Latest Guru Picks Value Strategies
Warren Buffett Portfolio Ben Graham Net-Net
Real Time Picks Buffett-Munger Screener
Aggregated Portfolio Undervalued Predictable
ETFs, Options Low P/S Companies
Insider Trends 10-Year Financials
52-Week Lows Interactive Charts
Model Portfolios DCF Calculator
RSS Feed Monthly Newsletters
The All-In-One Screener Portfolio Tracking Tool
iPhone App MORE GURUFOCUS LINKS
Latest Guru Picks Value Strategies
Warren Buffett Portfolio Ben Graham Net-Net
Real Time Picks Buffett-Munger Screener
Aggregated Portfolio Undervalued Predictable
ETFs, Options Low P/S Companies
Insider Trends 10-Year Financials
52-Week Lows Interactive Charts
Model Portfolios DCF Calculator
RSS Feed Monthly Newsletters
The All-In-One Screener Portfolio Tracking Tool
GLUU STOCK PRICE CHART 3.89 (1y: +40%) $(function(){var seriesOptions=[],yAxisOptions=[],name='GLUU',display='';Highcharts.setOptions({global:{useUTC:true}});var d=new Date();$current_day=d.getDay();if($current_day==5||$current_day==0||$current_day==6){day=4;}else{day=7;} seriesOptions[0]={id:name,animation:false,color:'#4572A7',lineWidth:1,name:name.toUpperCase()+' stock price',threshold:null,data:[[1369026000000,2.78],[1369112400000,2.77],[1369198800000,2.7],[1369285200000,2.63],[1369371600000,2.59],[1369717200000,2.65],[1369803600000,2.67],[1369890000000,2.76],[1369976400000,2.71],[1370235600000,2.64],[1370322000000,2.59],[1370408400000,2.44],[1370494800000,2.4],[1370581200000,2.51],[1370840400000,2.52],[1370926800000,2.43],[1371013200000,2.4],[1371099600000,2.44],[1371186000000,2.4],[1371445200000,2.39],[1371531600000,2.39],[1371618000000,2.36],[1371704400000,2.26],[1371790800000,2.23],[1372050000000,2.22],[1372136400000,2.36],[1372222800000,2.25],[1372309200000,2.26],[1372395600000,2.21],[1372654800000,2.35],[1372741200000,2.32],[1372827600000,2.58],[1373000400000,2.55],[1373259600000,2.49],[1373346000000,2.42],[1373432400000,2.44],[1373518800000,2.54],[1373605200000,2.52],[1373864400000,2.54],[1373950800000,2.745],[1374037200000,2.61],[1374123600000,2.66],[1374210000000,2.68],[1374469200000,2.74],[1374555600000,2.75],[1374642000000,2.67],[1374728400000,2.82],[1374814800000,2.77],[1375074000000,2.82],[1375160400000,2.82],[1375246800000,2.74],[1375333200000,2.75],[1375419600000,2.75],[1375678800000,2.75],[1375765200000,2.76],[1375851600000,2.45],[1375938000000,2.43],[1376024400000,2.47],[1376283600000,2.42],[1376370000000,2.38],[1376456400000,2.37],[1376542800000,2.31],[1376629200000,2.34],[1376888400000,2.28],[1376974800000,2.26],[1377061200000,2.19],[1377147600000,2.18],[1377234000000,2.39],[1377493200000,2.39],[1377579600000,2.39],[1377666000000,2.31],[1377752400000,2.39],[1377838800000,2.42],[1378184400000,2.45],[1378270800000,2.45],[1378357200000,2.42],[1378443600000,2.41],[1378702800000,2.43],[1378789200000,2.42],[1378875600000,2.41],[1378962000000,2.27],[1379048400000,2.14],[1379307600000,2.12],[1379394000000,2.18],[1379480400000,2.23],[1379566800000,2.35],[1379653200000,2.42],[1379912400000,2.41],[1379998800000,2.38],[1380085200000,2.6],[1380171600000,2.65],[1! 380258000000,2.82],[1380517200000,2.781],[1380603600000,2.9],[1380690000000,2.78],[1380776400000,2.65],[1380862800000,2.72],[1381122000000,2.73],[1381208400000,2.91],[1381294800000,2.84],[1381381200000,2.94],[1381467600000,3],[1381726800000,3.12],[1381813200000,3.09],[1381899600000,3.12],[1381986000000,3.15],[1382072400000,3.3],[1382331600000,3.23],[1382418000000,3.249],[1382504400000,3.15],[1382590800000,3.3],[1382677200000,3.42],[1382936400000,3.83],[1383022800000,3.91],[1383109200000,3.79],[1383195600000,3.4],[1383282000000,3.37],[1383544800000,3.405],[1383631200000,3.31],[1383717600000,3.2],[1383804000000,3.01],[1383890400000,3.21],[1384149600000,3.14],[1384236000000,3.14],[1384322400000,3.215],[1384408800000,3

Saturday, May 17, 2014

This 13th Century Tool Can Make You Serious Money Today

Every once in a while I like to circle back to some of the great questions I get from you.

Today, I want to dive into one from Suzanne P., who wants to know if "Fibos" can help her make money in the markets.

In a word, yes. But, you've got to understand what "Fibo" analysis is and how it works to make it profitable....

The Mathematical Sequence That Shows Up Everywhere

"Fibo" is short for Fibonacci - as in, Leonardo Fibonacci. Born in Pisa, Italy, around 1170, he's considered by many to be the single most influential western mathematician of the Middle Ages. His 1202 book, Liber Abaci ("Book of Calculation"), remains instrumental to our understanding of mathematics to this day and is filled with examples that applied to money-changing, interest calculation, and commercial bookkeeping, for example.

Today we know Leonardo simply as "Fibonacci," which is same name given to a numerical series in his book that he did not discover but that he used as an example. Despite their reputation as being difficult or complex, in reality, Fibonacci numbers are easy to learn and easy to understand.

The sequence, if you're counting, looks like this... 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 and so on.

Right away you can see a pattern. One plus one equals two. One plus two equals three. Two plus three equals five. And so on.

But if you look closer, something else emerges. Every number in the series is approximately 0.618-to-1 in terms of its relationship to the number after it. This ratio never changes because the proportion remains the same.

This is important so don't lose that thought; we're going to come back to it in a minute.

What's simply amazing to me is that Fibonacci (and lots of scientists after him) have found Fibonacci numbers in nature. For example, the number of petals on flowers is often a Fibonacci number, as are the number of "cells" in a pineapple's skin. Pinecones, sunflowers, beehives... they all display Fibonacci's numbers or sequence in some way.

More amazingly, plant leaves are often arranged in spirals or shapes that, when counted, are found to be adjacent Fibonacci numbers. In fact, if you divide the arc they form along a vine, for example, the arc length angle ratio is equal to 137.5 degrees. The numbers are so consistent that the relationship is actually called the "Golden Ratio" or the "Golden Mean."

Mathematically, it looks like this, where the Greek letter phi represents the golden ratio:


Geometrically, if you draw it out, the Fibonacci ratio or "Golden Mean," if you prefer, looks like this...
13th century tool

These relationships can be found all over the place in the natural world in everything from dolphins' fin sections to the ratio between human forearms and hands. Even the cochlea in our inner ear is a "golden" spiral adhering to this set of proportions.

Fibonacci numbers and ratios can also be found - you guessed it - in the stock market.

Fibo and Equities

Admittedly, a lot of people have problems coming to terms with this. The data is a dubious fit, they say. Or, the computerization makes a natural order impossible, they challenge.

13th century tool

I disagree. The stock market represents the combined inputs and decision making of millions of participants at once. That means it is more like a living, breathing system than a static one. So while computers may temporarily change things, the natural order of human decision making is still very much a part of how markets work. Which means you can use the Golden Mean and the Fibonacci sequence to analyze them if you know what you are doing.

For example, you can apply Fibonacci numbers to include range and retracement like this using a common tool known as the Fibonacci Arc, seen here on the right.

Notice how price tends to move from one key "Fibonacci" level to another, especially when it comes to spotting likely reversals or breakdowns.

13th century toolThe Fibonacci sequence can also be applied to time, as at left. I particularly like this type of Fibonacci analysis because knowing how time passes can help me understand whether trends are likely to continue or falter.

By the way, most online trading packages and analytics now include drawing tools based on the Fibonacci series. So even if you are mathematically challenged like I am, you can still harness the power inherent in the numbers.

Start by "anchoring" on a recent major swing high or low if you're a day trader. If you're an investor with a multi-year perspective, I think a major market turning point is more appropriate.

Then, extend the Fibonacci ratio or tool to subsequent turning points. What you are looking for is the "fit" between properly scaled charts and the Fibonacci tool you are using - be it arcs, lines, or ratios, for example.

You'll know you have it when prices line up along key lines and intervals. Then you can look to what traders call the "hard right edge" or the last data point you have available and predict likely future turning points and market trends, as well as potential breakouts and key reversal levels, even though they haven't happened yet - often with remarkable accuracy.

This, in turn, gives you an edge because you can be "on guard" for market movements that will take others by surprise.

Let me show you...

The Predictive Power of Fibonacci 13th century tool

The 57 % decline from October 2007 highs to March 2009 lows established an analytical anchor for the rally that built all the way to April 2010 when the markets had their first hiccup. Not coincidentally, the S&P 500 Index tacked on 83% over 13 months covering - drum roll, please - approximately 61.8% of the distances from the 2007 peak to the March 2009 low.

What's more, Fibonacci analysis suggested that the pullback would peter out around 1010 despite the fact that millions of investors thought we were one leg away from another financial apocolypse. In fact, it held at 1,008, which is almost smack on the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement level suggested by the Fibonacci series and, in turn, the converse of the Golden Ratio.

Subsequently, the index reversed and marched higher through May 2011, peaking just shy of the 78.6% before falling again to its next logical retracement level of 50% before taking off in earnest to where we are today.

Obviously there is an element of subjective interpretation here, but you cannot deny the fact that Fibonacci analysis helped investors identify each of these important market turning points months in advance.

This stuff is so good that I like to joke that if you put 5 Fibonacci practioniers in a room you will get 10 opinions about where the markets are headed.

All joking aside, though, no two investors have the same time frame or risk tolerances. So the fact that there is a difference in opinion is vindication that Fibonacci numbers can help you spot opportunities others don't see.

My good friend, Tom Gentile, agrees. Tom, who co-founded Optionetics, is one of the world's leading Fibonacci practioners. He believes "that there's definitely something there," which is why he uses both the Fibonacci ratio and the Golden Mean to pick entry prices and profit targets as part of his trading routine and as a complement to other analysis.

Knowing what I've just explained, you now have the power to do the same thing.

At the end of the day, there is no "Holy Grail," but the fact that an 800-year-old indicator works just as well today as it did centuries ago means there could be.

From the Editor: Do you have a question for Keith to address in a future "Marketology" column? E-mail him at customerservice@moneymorning.com and ask away. He'd love to hear from you.

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Top 10 Undervalued Companies To Watch For 2015

With every uptick of the S&P 500, it's getting more difficult to find undervalued stocks to buy. Nevertheless, a few great businesses have been left behind amid the market's surge, particularly Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) and Baidu (NASDAQ: BIDU  ) . Though both companies are definitely facing turbulence, a contrarian look reveals two excellent market leaders up for grabs at bargain prices.

Apple
"It seems like the company has been making headlines for all the wrong reasons lately," wrote Fool contributor Travis Hoium. With more than 200 days since the company's last major product launch, he�suggested that Apple needs to wow investors with a new product in order to change Wall Street's narrative.

Obviously, this is easier said than done, but don't count Apple out in 2013 yet. The company's product launches happen on a much faster timetable than its peers. For instance, Microsoft's Xbox One, announced last week, won't be available to consumers until "later this year." Even Samsung runs on a slower launch schedule than Apple. After a March 14 announcement, its Galaxy S4 won't reach U.S. carriers until April 26. Comparatively, the iPhone 5 was announced on Sept. 12, with pre-orders beginning Sept. 14, and shipments and availability in nine countries including the U.S. and Canada on Sept. 21. In other words, Apple could turn the tables on its skeptics very quickly.

Top 10 Undervalued Companies To Watch For 2015: Caterpillar Inc.(CAT)

Caterpillar Inc. manufactures and sells construction and mining equipment, diesel and natural gas engines, industrial gas turbines, and diesel-electric locomotives worldwide. It operates through three lines of businesses: Machinery, Engines, and Financial Products. The Machinery business offers construction, mining, and forestry machinery, including track and wheel tractors, track and wheel loaders, pipelayers, motor graders, wheel tractor-scrapers, track and wheel excavators, backhoe loaders, log skidders, log loaders, off-highway trucks, articulated trucks, paving products, skid steer loaders, underground mining equipment, tunnel boring equipment, and related parts. It also manufactures diesel-electric locomotives; and manufactures and services rail-related products and logistics services for other companies. The Engines business provides diesel, heavy fuel, and natural gas reciprocating engines for Caterpillar machinery, electric power generation systems, marine, petrol eum, construction, industrial, agricultural, and other applications. It offers industrial turbines and turbine-related services for oil and gas, and power generation applications. This business also remanufactures Caterpillar engines, machines, and engine components; and offers remanufacturing services for other companies. The Financial Products business provides retail and wholesale financing alternatives for Caterpillar machinery and engines, solar gas turbines, and other equipment and marine vessels, as well as offers loans and various forms of insurance to customers and dealers. It also offers financing for vehicles, power generation facilities, and marine vessels. The company markets its products directly, as well as through its distribution centers, dealers, and distributors. It was formerly known as Caterpillar Tractor Co. and changed its name to Caterpillar Inc. in 1986. Caterpillar Inc. was founded in 1925 and is headquartered in Peoria, Illinois.

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Jeremy Bowman]

    Among Dow stocks moving higher today was�Caterpillar� (NYSE: CAT  ) , which jumped 2.8% today as it defends its tax-avoidance practices in front of Congress this week. The heavy-equipment maker responded to allegations from a Senate subcommittee that said it has avoided $2.4 billion in taxes over the last 13 years by moving profits to a Swiss affiliate without transferring employees or business activities. Executives defended the practices, saying that "business practices drives our tax structure," not the other way around. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) took the opposite tack from Democrats in grilling the multinational manufacturer, going as far to salute Caterpillar for its strategy and success as an iconic American business. "We should probably give Caterpillar an award," he said. "It is a requirement that you try to minimize your costs. So rather than chastising Caterpillar we should be complimenting them." Caterpillar is just one of many blue chips that's been hauled before Congress to defend its tax strategy. Investors seemed to like the results of the hearing based on the stock's gains.�

  • [By Matt Thalman]

    Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT  ) rose 0.88% after the release of the strong homebuilder confidence and industrial production numbers, the latter of which takes into account not only output from U.S. factories but also from mines and utility companies. And since Caterpillar is a big player in the mining equipment field, investors surely saw this report as good news for the company.

  • [By Jeremy Bowman]

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) �traded mostly mixed today as investors reacted to an ambiguous earnings season thus far, finishing the day up 0.1%. Even then, it was the worst performer among the three major indexes. Stock downgrades weighed on the blue chips, while Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT  ) shares jumped despite missing earnings estimates.

Top 10 Undervalued Companies To Watch For 2015: Schlumberger N.V.(SLB)

Schlumberger Limited, together with its subsidiaries, supplies technology, integrated project management, and information solutions to the oil and gas exploration and production industries worldwide. The company?s Oilfield Services segment provides exploration and production services; wireline technology that offers open-hole and cased-hole services; supplies engineering support, directional-drilling, measurement-while-drilling, and logging-while-drilling services; and testing services. This segment also offers well services; supplies well completion services and equipment; artificial lift; data and consulting services; geo services; and information solutions, such as consulting, software, information management system, and IT infrastructure services that support oil and gas industry. Its WesternGeco segment provides reservoir imaging, monitoring, and development services; and operates data processing centers and multiclient seismic library. This segment also offers variou s services include 3D and time-lapse (4D) seismic surveys to multi-component surveys for delineating prospects and reservoir management. The company?s M-I SWACO segment supplies drilling fluid systems to improve drilling performance; fluid systems and specialty tools to optimize wellbore productivity; production technology solutions to maximize production rates; and environmental solutions that manages waste volumes generated in drilling and production operations. Its Smith Oilfield segment designs, manufactures, and markets drill bits and borehole enlargement tools; and supplies drilling tools and services, tubular, completion services, and other related downhole solutions. The company?s Distribution segment markets pipes, valves, and fittings, as well as mill, safety, and other maintenance products. This segment also provides warehouse management, vendor integration, and inventory management services. Schlumberger Limited was founded in 1927 and is based in Houston, Texas.

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By David Smith]

    It's now two to one among the big oil-field services companies regarding the North American oil and gas markets. Through Monday, Schlumberger (NYSE: SLB  ) , the largest company in the sector had expressed concern about the market and its short-term prospects, while Halliburton (NYSE: HAL  ) , the second-biggest member of the group, joined Baker Hughes (NYSE: BHI  ) in assessing our continent's activity levels more positively.

  • [By Matt DiLallo]

    For example, Halliburton (NYSE: HAL  ) saw record first-quarter revenue of $7 billion. Declining rig counts and pricing pressures in North America were still more than offset by the company's international operations. Meanwhile,�Schlumberger's (NYSE: SLB  ) results seemed to mirror National Oilwell Varco's in that its revenue was up over the year-ago quarter but slipped sequentially. Again, though, the story here was strength internationally with weakness in North America. Further, both companies are very optimistic about the future and neither see any signs of a business slowdown.�

  • [By Lee Jackson]

    Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE: SLB) is the other top services name to own for 2014. The company looks to grow its share of E&P spending in 2014 and expects its margins to run higher than in the past. The Merrill Lynch analysts are negative on small and mid cap North American focused service companies. Investors are paid a 1.4% dividend. The Merrill Lynch price objective for the stock is $111, and the consensus target is set at $110.�Shares�closed Monday at $87.32.

10 Best Heal Care Stocks To Own Right Now: Tupperware Corporation(TUP)

Tupperware Brands Corporation operates as a direct seller of various products across a range of brands and categories through an independent sales force. The company engages in the manufacture and sale of kitchen and home products, and beauty and personal care products. It offers preparation, storage, and serving solutions for the kitchen and home, as well as kitchen cookware and tools, children?s educational toys, microwave products, and gifts under the Tupperware brand name primarily in Europe, Africa, the Middle East, the Asia Pacific, and North America. The company provides beauty and personal care products, which include skin care products, cosmetics, bath and body care, toiletries, fragrances, nutritional products, apparel, and related products principally in Mexico, South Africa, the Philippines, Australia, and Uruguay. It offers beauty and personal care products under the Armand Dupree, Avroy Shlain, BeautiControl, Fuller, NaturCare, Nutrimetics, Nuvo, and Swissgar de brand names. The company sells its Tupperware products directly to distributors, directors, managers, and dealers; and beauty products primarily through consultants and directors. As of December 26, 2009, the Tupperware distribution system had approximately 1,800 distributors, 61,300 managers, and 1.3 million dealers; and the sales force representing the Beauty businesses approximately 1.1 million. The company was formerly known as Tupperware Corporation and changed its name to Tupperware Brands Corporation in December 2005. The company was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in Orlando, Florida.

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Eric Volkman]

    Tupperware Brands (NYSE: TUP  ) is reaching into its corporate bowl for a fresh payout to shareholders. The company has declared a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. This will be paid on July 8 to stockholders of record as of June 19. That amount matches the firm's previous distribution, which was paid in early April. Prior to that, Tupperware Brands was rather less generous, handing out $0.36 per share.

  • [By Arie Goren]

    After running this screen on May 21, 2013, before the markets' open, I discovered the following eight stocks: Sunoco Logistics Partners LP (SXL), Leggett & Platt Inc (LEG), Copa Holdings SA (CPA), RPC Inc. (RES), Tupperware Brands Corp. (TUP), Herbalife Ltd. (HLF), John Wiley & Sons Inc. (JW.A) and C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (CHRW).

  • [By Dan Caplinger]

    Where growth will come from
    One area that Newell Rubbermaid still has to tap fully is emerging markets. The company has done a good job of expanding overseas, with 17% annual growth in Latin America. But with barely a quarter of its sales coming from outside the U.S. and Canada, the company has a lot further to go. Storage rival Tupperware (NYSE: TUP  ) gets fully 60% of its total revenue from emerging markets, and it too has seen impressive gains in South America as well as the Asia-Pacific region.

  • [By John Kell]

    Among the companies with shares expected to actively trade in Wednesday’s session are Dow Chemical Co.(DOW), Tupperware Brands Corp.(TUP) and Yahoo Inc.(YHOO)

Top 10 Undervalued Companies To Watch For 2015: Dollar Tree Inc.(DLTR)

Dollar Tree, Inc. operates discount variety stores in the United States and Canada. Its stores offer merchandise primarily at the fixed price of $1.00. The company operates its stores under the names of Dollar Tree, Deal$, Dollar Tree Deal$, Dollar Giant, and Dollar Bills. Its stores offer consumable merchandise, including candy and food, and health and beauty care, as well as household consumables, such as paper, plastics, household chemicals, in select stores, and frozen and refrigerated food; variety merchandise, which includes toys, durable housewares, gifts, party goods, greeting cards, softlines, and other items; and seasonal goods, such as Easter, Halloween, and Christmas merchandise. As of April 30, 2011, it operated 4,089 stores in 48 states and the District of Columbia, as well as 88 stores in Canada. The company was founded in 1986 and is based in Chesapeake, Virginia.

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Jon C. Ogg]

    Deutsche Bank is making a change in its coverage of dollar store themes on Monday: Dollar Tree Inc. (NASDAQ: DLTR) was raised to Buy from Hold and Family Dollar Stores Inc. (NYSE: FDO)�was downgraded to Hold from Buy, but the price target was raised to $74 from $70.

  • [By Paul Ausick]

    Dollar General�� share price is up less than 6% in the past 12 months, but since the beginning of the year shares have risen more than 22%. And even then, Dollar General�trails Dollar Tree Inc. (NASDAQ: DLTR) in share price growth since January 1. Dollar Tree stock is up 30%.